The FCA’s Scandalous Intervention in the Supreme Court Motor Finance Case

As the Supreme Court prepares to decide one of the most significant consumer cases in recent years, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has taken a position that has left many observers stunned. At the heart of the case lies the issue of undisclosed commission payments in motor finance agreements — a practice that many argue amounts to bribery by any other name.

Yet, rather than aligning itself with the millions of consumers affected by this latest in a long line of financial mis-selling scandals, the FCA has chosen to intervene in support of the very lenders responsible for the sole purpose to save its own embarrassing failures in allowing such practices to flourish.

A Supreme Court Battle Over Bribery and Fairness

The ongoing legal battle centres on whether car finance providers and brokers acted unlawfully by failing to disclose commission arrangements to customers — guiding consumers to more expensive finance agreements that paid more commission to dealerships.

Lower courts have already indicated that this kind of commission structure can amount to a breach of duty or even a form of bribery. Consumers were left in the dark while dealers profited unfairly — all under the umbrella of supposedly regulated practices.

The Supreme Court is now asked to rule on these practices and whether consumers are entitled to redress for the hidden costs and conflicts of interest.

The FCA’s Shocking Position

Instead of standing up for consumers and ensuring fairness in financial services — as it is mandated to do — the FCA has intervened in the Supreme Court case to support the lenders.

This intervention has raised eyebrows across the legal and financial sectors. It follows a worrying pattern of regulatory leniency and a failure to act decisively in previous scandals such as PPI and interest rate hedging products.

Rather than protecting consumers, the FCA’s position appears to defend the integrity of a system already proven to be fundamentally flawed.

Protecting the Industry at the Expense of Consumers

The FCA’s reasoning seems to stem from a desire to protect the financial stability of motor finance providers — even if that means undermining consumer trust and turning a blind eye to unethical practices.

This is not just a poor judgment call — it is a scandalous dereliction of duty from the body charged with regulating financial conduct in the UK. By siding with the lenders, the FCA risks being viewed not as a consumer protector, but as an industry enabler.

What Happens Next?

The Supreme Court will soon issue a ruling that could unlock billions of pounds in compensation for mis-sold motor finance agreements. Whatever the outcome, the FCA’s intervention has already done serious damage to its credibility.

Consumers deserve a regulator that fights for fairness, not one that shields corporations from the consequences of their own misconduct.

Conclusion

The FCA’s intervention in this landmark case is nothing short of disgraceful. While the courts examine whether customers were effectively the victims of behind closed doors bribes, resulting in them signing inflated finance deals, the FCA has made its stance clear — and it’s not on the side of the public.

This moment must serve as a wake-up call. Regulatory reform is needed, and consumer trust must be rebuilt — not sacrificed to protect those who profited from deception.

YOUR MONEY CLAIM