The Financial Ombudsman Service Charges: A Disaster for Vulnerable Consumers

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has long been a vital avenue for consumers seeking justice against financial wrongdoing. However, the recent decision to impose charges on professional representatives who bring cases on behalf of consumers threatens to undermine access to fair redress—particularly for the most vulnerable in society.

The Unseen Consequences of the New Charges

From April 2025, the FOS will introduce a £250 fee for claims management companies (CMCs) and other professional representatives bringing complaints on behalf of consumers. While the charge is reduced to £75 if the complaint is upheld, this financial burden will inevitably lead professional representation only being available for high value claims. This move, though framed as a way to prevent excessive or weak claims, will instead have serious consequences for the very people the FOS was designed to protect.

A Response to the Motor Finance Mis-Selling Scandal?

This drastic policy shift comes in the wake of the motor finance mis-selling scandal, one of the most significant financial mis-selling cases in recent history. Millions of consumers may have been affected by unfair commission structures and hidden costs tied to motor finance agreements. The introduction of these FOS charges appears to be a direct deterrent to the complaints arising from this latest scandal. Rather than facilitating justice for those impacted, regulators and the government seem intent on discouraging claims by making it more difficuly for vulnerable consumers to access professional representation.

By introducing financial barriers to representation, there is a real concern that this is yet another attempt to sweep the motor finance mis-selling scandal under the carpet. Regulators and financial institutions have been under increasing pressure to address widespread misconduct in the motor finance sector, but rather than prioritising consumer redress, they appear to be putting obstacles in place to protect financial firms from accountability.

The Disadvantage for Vulnerable Consumers

Many consumers—especially those who are elderly, financially inexperienced, or suffering from mental health challenges—rely on professional representatives to navigate the often complex complaints process. Financial institutions do not make it easy for customers to challenge unfair treatment, and have a proven history of rejecting millions of valid complaints. Without the knowledge, confidence, or persistence required to bring and escalate a complaint, many consumers simply give up when faced with resistance from lenders.

A large proportion of individuals who attempt to complain directly to their financial provider do not take their case any further if their initial complaint is rejected. This is often due to a lack of understanding about their rights, fear of bureaucracy, or the emotional toll of fighting financial institutions alone. Many valid claims go unchallenged, allowing lenders to avoid accountability. This reality will only be exacerbated if access to professional help is restricted by punitive FOS charges.

The Huge Benefits of Professional Representation

Professional representatives exist for a reason. They level the playing field against well-resourced financial institutions that have legal teams dedicated to minimising payouts. Here’s why using a professional representative remains a vital option for consumers:

• Expert Knowledge: Professional representatives understand financial regulations and common law, ensuring that complaints are structured correctly and presented with strong supporting evidence.
• Persistence Against Lender Rejections: Unlike individual consumers who may abandon their claim at the first hurdle, professional representatives continue the fight for justice, ensuring cases are pursued all the way to a fair resolution.
• Less Stress for Consumers: Dealing with a complaint against a financial institution can be daunting, with responses from lenders often referring to regulations and court cases that everyday consumers will have little knowledge of. Professional representatives remove this burden, allowing consumers to focus on their wellbeing while experts handle the case.

A Step Backwards for Consumer Rights

The FOS charge for representatives is not just a cost to businesses—it is a direct attack on consumer access to justice. By discouraging professional assistance, the policy will lead to valid complaints not being pursued and more consumers being left out of pocket, with financial institutions facing even less scrutiny for their actions. Vulnerable consumers will be the biggest losers in this misguided policy change.

Instead of penalising professional representation, the FOS should recognise the vital role that representatives play in securing fair outcomes. Without them, millions of consumers who rightfully deserve compensation may never receive it. The financial industry is complex, and justice should not be reserved only for those who can navigate it alone.

YOUR MONEY CLAIM